Zobrazit minimální záznam

dc.contributor.advisorHanzal, Vladimír
dc.contributor.authorZevl, Jiří
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-30T11:08:31Z
dc.date.available2021-11-30T11:08:31Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.date.submitted2013-04-26
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.jcu.cz/handle/20.500.14390/12566
dc.format80
dc.format80
dc.language.isocze
dc.publisherJihočeská univerzitacze
dc.rightsBez omezení
dc.subjectmyslivostcze
dc.subjectčerná zvěřcze
dc.subjectškodacze
dc.subjectpoškození porostucze
dc.subjectochrana proti škodámcze
dc.subjecthuntingeng
dc.subjectwild boareng
dc.subjectdamage of vegetationeng
dc.subjectprotection against damageeng
dc.titlePosouzení škod zvěří na rodinné farmě ve Lhoticíchcze
dc.title.alternativeAssessment of damage by animals on the family farm in Lhoticeeng
dc.typediplomová prácecze
dc.identifier.stag28999
dc.description.abstract-translatedThe aim of this work was to assess the damage caused by wild boar in terms of ecosystem-based pespective, take into account the influence of historical development, document the current status and predict the direction of development. I focused on the farm of Jiri Zevl in Lhotice. I analysed and evaluated the damages caused by wild boar. I already applied measures in terms of their actual effectiveness. In the years 2010, 2011 and 2012, I focused on all the fields on the farm, where damages were noticed. Farm in the period began to apply these two measures against damages caused by animals: chemical protection by Hukinol and also cultivation awned wheat varieties. I compared damage on fields before and after protection. I've always found out and filed damage just a few days before harvesting. For the actual detection and damage assessment, I chose the method of visual inspection. I measured and calculated surface damage I measured individual damaged areas with a tape measure and method of irregular shapes transformed into geometric shapes, Than I calculated their area. According to my research is chemical protection effective as well as the growing awned wheat varieties. In 2010, there were used no precautions, was the damage 31,539 CZK and there was damaged 18.3% of the area of all fields in research. In 2011, the financial loss decreased to 14 941 CZK and the area damaged by animals to 3.7 % of the total area. In 2012, the damaged area was 7.8 % and financial loss increased to 29 054 CZK. In conclusion I make recommendations for further action that should dechne damages in the coming years. On the issue of damage caused by wild boar on crops, I have two suggestions: 68 First: It is neccesary to handle this issue since its inception. Increase in the numbers of wild boars has caused intensive farming that disrupted the flow of energy in the country. The solution could be partial cancellation of obligations of users of hunting grounds cover damage caused by animals. It is necessary to rethink the system, which works now. Not only hunters should be responsible for damage, but also farmers, or owners. Second: It is necessary to solve the problem of farmers and users of hunting grounds together. It is necessary to choose such a user hunting who will cooperate and will take care to avoid damage. Recovery of damages from the users of hunting area doesn´t solve the problem in the long term sight, it is only a short-term basis and short-sighted.eng
dc.date.accepted2014-02-05
dc.description.departmentZemědělská fakultacze
dc.thesis.degree-disciplineZemědělské inženýrstvícze
dc.thesis.degree-grantorJihočeská univerzita. Zemědělská fakultacze
dc.thesis.degree-nameIng.
dc.thesis.degree-programZemědělské inženýrstvícze
dc.description.gradeDokončená práce s úspěšnou obhajoboucze


Soubory tohoto záznamu

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Tento záznam se objevuje v

Zobrazit minimální záznam