Zobrazit minimální záznam

dc.contributor.advisorFuchs, Roman
dc.contributor.authorDobrovodský, Juraj
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-08T14:23:53Z
dc.date.available2022-03-08T14:23:53Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.date.submitted2017-12-13
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.jcu.cz/handle/20.500.14390/38576
dc.description.abstractWidely known fact is the generalist predators are averse to ants. This is the reason why more than 300 species of spiders choos special life strategy myrmecomorphy. In my master thesis I tested proteective quality of myrmecomorphyof Phrurolithus festivus compared whith cricket Gryllus assimilis, non-myrmecomorph spider Lycosa sp young nymps and Lasius niger ants. The chosen predator was great tit Parus major. This is the first time when vertebrate predator was used for testing myrmecomorphy. In the experiment great tits choose between combination of two preys. These combinations were ant-cricket, non-myrmecomorp spider-myrmecomorph spider, ant myrmecomorph spider. I was interested in two facts: for first how long time grat tits spend by detecrement between both of the preys and for second which prey was choosen. The time while great tits recognize the prey was short and very similar for all of the experiments. The difference was not significant. In the prey choice experiment for first, great tits prefer crickets before ants. In comparison experiment bitween myrmecomorp spider non-mrmecomorp spider great tits unambigously choose common spider, the myrmecomorph spiders were not attacked. Experiment whit myrmecomorph spider and ant show us the protection of myrmecomorphy is good but not perfect. Both of them was choosen, but still less commonly then other edible preys in experiments above. This experiment show me antoher interesting fact. While great tit choose between ant and myrmecomorp in time they came to be more inaccurate. Quite commonly choose ants on the and of experimental series. It maybe means the protection leads tits to incorrect choice. This experiment shown us, the myrmecomorph protection of the P. festuvis is functional, but it depends on enviroment and the comparison. I believe protection of spider greatly work on field, because tits do not have chance to make comparison and the enviroment is more dissected and dispersive.cze
dc.format39 s. .(64 844 znaků)
dc.format39 s. .(64 844 znaků)
dc.language.isocze
dc.publisherJihočeská univerzitacze
dc.rightsBez omezení
dc.subjectmyrmekomorfiecze
dc.subjectmimikrycze
dc.subjectPhrurolithus spcze
dc.subjectLasius spcze
dc.subjectsýkora koňadracze
dc.subjectpredacecze
dc.subjectmaskovanícze
dc.subjectmyrmecomorphyeng
dc.subjectmimicryeng
dc.subjectPhrurolithus speng
dc.subjectLasius speng
dc.subjectgreat titeng
dc.subjectpredationeng
dc.subjectmasquaradeeng
dc.titleZávislost mimetické podobnosti myrmekomorfních pavouků na nechutnosti modelucze
dc.title.alternativeRelationship of myrmecomorph spiders, ants and predatorseng
dc.typediplomová prácecze
dc.identifier.stag40442
dc.description.abstract-translatedIn this master thesis i was tested the effectiveness of the myrmecomorphy.The animals which ones were tested are Phrurolithus festivus the myrmecomorphic spider and the predator, great tit(Parus major). I want to know the adventages and disadventages of myrmecomorph mimicry compared whit other common invertebrates in natural habitat of great tits.eng
dc.date.accepted2018-01-17
dc.description.departmentPřírodovědecká fakultacze
dc.thesis.degree-disciplineZoologie - specializace Entomologiecze
dc.thesis.degree-grantorJihočeská univerzita. Přírodovědecká fakultacze
dc.thesis.degree-nameMgr.
dc.thesis.degree-programZoologiecze
dc.description.gradeDokončená práce s úspěšnou obhajoboucze
dc.contributor.refereeLandová, Eva
dc.contributor.refereeZrzavý, Jan


Soubory tohoto záznamu

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Tento záznam se objevuje v

Zobrazit minimální záznam