Zobrazit minimální záznam

dc.contributor.advisorŠtefka, Jan
dc.contributor.authorFlegrová, Tereza
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-06T08:06:14Z
dc.date.available2025-03-06T08:06:14Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.date.submitted2022-04-13
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.jcu.cz/handle/20.500.14390/46232
dc.description.abstractUsing amplicon sequencing, this study reveals dicyemid diversity around the world as well as within individual cephalopod hosts. A wide number of samples of multiple species were collected to reflect true dicyemid diversity. Heterogeneity primers were designed in order to improve the sequencing performance of the Illumina platform. A complex bioinformatic pipeline was implemented to process non-overlapping reads. The species delimitation methods were used to categorize occurring dicyemid types. Using the output of implemented methods, dicyemid diversity was assessed, proposing new trends opposing the current methodology.cze
dc.format83 s. (93019 znaků bez mezer)
dc.format83 s. (93019 znaků bez mezer)
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherJihočeská univerzitacze
dc.rightsBez omezení
dc.subjectamplikonové sekvenovánícze
dc.subjectdicyemidacze
dc.subjectpopulační diverzitacze
dc.subjectilluminacze
dc.subjectamplicon sequencingeng
dc.subjectdicyemidaeng
dc.subjectpopulation diversityeng
dc.subjectilluminaeng
dc.titleAnalysis of the dicyemid diversity using amplicon sequencingcze
dc.title.alternativeAnalysis of the dicyemid diversity using amplicon sequencingeng
dc.typediplomová prácecze
dc.identifier.stag59930
dc.date.accepted2022-05-25
dc.description.departmentPřírodovědecká fakultacze
dc.thesis.degree-disciplineExperimentální biologie - specializace Molekulární a buněčná biologie a genetikacze
dc.thesis.degree-grantorJihočeská univerzita. Přírodovědecká fakultacze
dc.thesis.degree-nameMgr.
dc.thesis.degree-programBiologiecze
dc.description.gradeDokončená práce s úspěšnou obhajoboucze
dc.description.defence<p>Obhajoba prebehla hybridnou formou cez platformu Zoom.</p> <p>Komisia&nbsp;v&nbsp;zložení: Mgr. Lenka Chodáková, Ph.D. - předseda, Mgr. Adam Bajgar, Ph.D., RNDr. Radek Šíma, Ph.D., RNDr. Alena Panicucci Zíková, Ph.D.</p> <p>Oponenti: RNDr. Aleš Horák, Ph.D., RNDr. Petr Nguyen, Ph.D. (online)</p> <p>Zapisovateľ: Mgr. Lenka Chodáková, Ph.D.</p> <p>Počet hostů: 5</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Priebeh: Mentor read his review, he acknowledged Terezas&#39;s work and the mentor is happy with her work and praised her good work. Student presented her work in the limit.</p> <p>Oponent RNDr. Aleš Horák, Ph.D. commented on Tereza&#39;s thesis and concluded his review - he acknowledged student&#39;s good work and the design of the project. He slightly critisized the results section but overall was satisfied.<br /> During the discussion with student the oponent asked 5 questions which the student sufficiently answered.</p> <p>Oponent RNDr. Petr Nguyen, Ph.D. (online) also acknowledged Tereza&#39;s good work, but with several comments on the results section. The oponent asked 6 questions and with the student discussed the comments.</p> <p>The comitee acknowledged the students work and good presentation of the results.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p>cze


Soubory tohoto záznamu

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Tento záznam se objevuje v

Zobrazit minimální záznam