Zobrazit minimální záznam

dc.contributor.authorMusil, Davidcze
dc.contributor.authorŠnorek, M.cze
dc.contributor.authorGallo, J.cze
dc.contributor.authorJahoda, D.cze
dc.contributor.authorStehlík, Jiřícze
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-04T17:39:49Z
dc.date.available2021-03-04T17:39:49Z
dc.date.issued2019cze
dc.identifier.issn0001-5415cze
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.jcu.cz/handle/20.500.14390/601
dc.description.abstractDiagnostika a léčba infekce kloubní náhrady je velmi nákladná. Autoři sledovali 36 pacientů s infekční komplikací totální náhrady kyčelního kloubu. Ženy převažovaly v poměru 20:16.cze
dc.formatp. 241-248cze
dc.language.isoczecze
dc.publisherČeská společnost pro ortopedii a traumatologiicze
dc.relation.ispartofActa chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Čechoslovaca, volume 86, issue: 4cze
dc.subjecttotální náhrada kyčelního kloubucze
dc.subjectinfekcecze
dc.subjectekonomická analýzacze
dc.subjecttotal hip arthroplastyeng
dc.subjectPJI-periprosthetic joint infectioneng
dc.subjecteconomic analysiseng
dc.titleEkonomická analýza nákladů na hospitalizaci pacientů s infekční komplikací totální náhrady. 2. část: totální náhrada kyčelního kloubucze
dc.title.alternativeEconomic Analysis of the Costs of Hospital Stay of Patients with Infection as a Complication of Total Replacements - Part 2: Total Hip Arthroplastyeng
dc.typearticlecze
dc.identifier.obd43884786cze
dc.description.abstract-translatedThe study aims to quantify the costs of a hospital stay of patients with periprosthetic joint infection after total hip arthroplasty throughout the period of treatment. The group included patients who have been treated at our department for infection as a complication of total hip replacement since 1 January 2011, who have been provided with treatment (including complications) exclusively at the departments of Nemocnice České Budějovice, a.s. and whose treatment can be considered completed in 2019. The patients were included in the study regardless of the type of infection and method of treatment. The group consisted of 36 patients (16 men and 20 women). There were 3 cases of early postoperative infection, 14 cases of late postoperative infection and 19 cases of hematogenous infection. The group includes 8 patients treated by a one-stage reimplantation, 19 patients managed by a two-stage reimplantation, 6 patients treated by a revision surgery with implant retention, and 3 patients in whom only the implant removal was possible. In selected patients, all the reported points for all the hospital stays and costs incurred on a separately charged material were ascertained and the final sum was compared with the reimbursement obtained by the hospital in the DRG system valid for the respective year of treatment. The total costs were analysed and also an analysis by type of infection and method of treatment was carried out.eng
dc.peerreviewedyescze
dc.publicationstatuspostprintcze
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://www.achot.cz/detail.php?stat=1067cze


Soubory tohoto záznamu

Thumbnail

Tento záznam se objevuje v

Zobrazit minimální záznam